Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Just Made a Shocking New Argument -- Will It Change Trial #2?

At Lindsay Clancy’s first trial, everyone seemed to agree that she killed Cora, Dawson and Callan — the fight was over whether she was criminally responsible. Now her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, is making a startling new argument: the prosecution never actually proved she did it. I went back through the trial to see what the defense told the jury then—and whether this new argument holds up.

Lindsay Clancy was tried in a Massachusetts courtroom, charged with murder. When one juror held out, a mistrial was declared. Lindsay Clancy says she is not criminally responsible for what happened, because she was in postpartum psychosis.

Enjoying the content? Join us by becoming a channel member!
https://www.youtube.com/@harvardlawyerlee

VENMO: @LawyerLeeW
PAYPAL: @LawyerLeeW

TWITTER: LawyerLeeW
PODCAST: https://lawyerleecasefiles.buzzsprout.com

MODERATORS:  Many thanks to marlonmaastricht and mamapinks, the best mods anywhere.
OUTRO: by MarlonMaastricht

All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).