Lindsay Clancy Case Completely Changed in Closing Arguments (Trial Day 22)

The Lindsay Clancy case looked very different by closing arguments than it did at the start of trial. The Commonwealth narrowed its theory after overpromising in opening, while the defense offered jurors multiple paths to reasonable doubt.

In this video, I break down both closings, the arguments that disappeared, the evidence that suddenly mattered most, and what the jury is now being asked to decide.

Lindsay Clancy is on trial in a Massachusetts courtroom. She says she is not criminally responsible for what happened, because she was in postpartum psychosis.

#Lindsayclancy #news #trial #clancy #postpartum #psychosis #lawyerlee

******* I have a brand-new podcast !! ********
Check it out at: https://lawyerleecasefiles.buzzsprout.com

Enjoying the content? Join us by becoming a channel member!
https://www.youtube.com/@harvardlawyerlee

Venmo: @LawyerLeeW
PayPal: @LawyerLeeW
TWITTER: LawyerLeeW
MODERATORS:  Many thanks to marlonmaastricht and mamapinks, the best mods anywhere.
OUTRO: by MarlonMaastricht

All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).